---
title: "Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models"
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
license_note: "paper is CC BY 4.0 (verified on arXiv abs page 2026-10-18; icon by-4.0.png, link text view license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/); note is our own summary"
source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04091
source_license: "CC BY 4.0"
attribution: "Summary by iinventedlight (AI-assisted). Source: Lei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, Yunshi Lan, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Ee-Peng Lim, \"Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models\" (CC BY 4.0)."
condensed_by: "iinventedlight (Grok Bot, AI-assisted)"
fact_checked: 2026-10-18
date: 2026-10-18
status: published
category: arxiv
arxiv_id: 2305.04091
alias: 2305.04091-plan-and-solve-prompting
checked_on: 2026-10-18
sources:
  - id: S1
    title: "Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models"
    authors: "Lei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, Yunshi Lan, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Ee-Peng Lim"
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04091
    version_read: v3 (26 May 2023)
    accessed: 2026-10-18
    license: CC BY 4.0
    attribution: "Lei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu, Yunshi Lan, Roy Ka-Wei Lee, Ee-Peng Lim, Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models, ACL 2023, CC BY 4.0, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04091"
---
# Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Models

## Summary
Wang, Xu, Lan, Hu, Lan, Lee, and Lim start from zero-shot chain-of-thought, the habit of asking a model to reason step by step with no worked examples. They say that pattern still makes calculation errors, skips steps, and misreads the question. Plan-and-Solve splits the prompt into two moves: first write a plan that divides the task into smaller pieces, then carry those pieces out. A stricter variant, PS+, adds more detailed instructions aimed at calculation mistakes and weak steps. On GPT-3, across ten datasets and three kinds of reasoning problem, the abstract reports that this zero-shot pattern beat plain zero-shot chain-of-thought on every set, matched or beat zero-shot program-of-thought prompting, and landed in the same range as eight-shot chain-of-thought on the math problems. The abs page comments list ACL 2023. This note follows that abstract page only.

## When to apply
- You want a zero-shot prompt that plans before it calculates, without a hand-written worksheet of examples.
- The comparison is the authors' GPT-3 runs on the datasets they chose. It is not a claim about every later model.

## Costs and limits
- The abstract does not list the ten dataset names. This note does not invent them and does not re-check the PDF.
- A code link is mentioned on the abs page. That repository's license was not checked, so it is not a source here.

## Evidence (detail)
- The abs page (v3, 26 May 2023) names three failure modes of zero-shot chain-of-thought: calculation errors, missing-step errors, and semantic misunderstanding (Abstract).
- Plan-and-Solve is defined there as devising a plan that splits the task, then carrying out the subtasks. PS+ adds more detailed instructions (Abstract).
- Reported comparison, GPT-3: better than zero-shot chain-of-thought on all ten datasets, comparable to or above zero-shot program-of-thought, and comparable to 8-shot chain-of-thought on the math reasoning problem (Abstract).
- Comments line: "ACL 2023".

## Facts
- id: F1
  claim: Plan-and-Solve prompting first asks for a plan that splits the task, then asks the model to carry out those smaller pieces, with no few-shot worksheet.
  confidence: medium
  date: 2026-10-18
  sources: [S1 Abstract]
  license: CC BY 4.0
- id: F2
  claim: The abstract reports that on GPT-3 this zero-shot pattern beat zero-shot chain-of-thought across ten datasets and was comparable to eight-shot chain-of-thought on the math problems they tested.
  confidence: medium
  date: 2026-10-18
  sources: [S1 Abstract]
  license: CC BY 4.0
- id: F3
  claim: The arXiv abs page comments field says ACL 2023, and the license link on that page is CC BY 4.0.
  confidence: high
  date: 2026-10-18
  sources: [S1 abs page]
  license: CC BY 4.0

## Related
- 2201.11903 Chain-of-Thought Prompting, the few-shot worked-example pattern. This paper is the zero-shot "plan, then solve" variant.
- 2305.10601 Tree of Thoughts searches among several intermediate steps. Plan-and-Solve is a single planned trace.

## Review notes
- Staging draft. Paraphrase of the arXiv abstract page checked 2026-10-18. The PDF was not re-read.
- License on the abs page: icon by-4.0.png, link text "view license", http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.