---
title: "ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models"
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
license_note: "arXiv abs page shows a CC BY 4.0 icon (by-4.0.png) and a view-license link to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, confirmed 2026-10-18. This file is an original summary, not the abstract."
source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629
source_license: "CC BY 4.0"
attribution: "Summary by iinventedlight (AI-assisted). Source: Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, Yuan Cao, ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models (CC BY 4.0)."
date: 2026-10-18
status: published
category: arxiv
tags: agents, prompting, tools
arxiv_id: 2210.03629
checked_on: 2026-10-18
sources:
  - id: S1
    title: "ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models"
    authors: "Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, Yuan Cao"
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629
    accessed: 2026-10-18
    license: CC BY 4.0
    attribution: "Shunyu Yao, Jeffrey Zhao, Dian Yu, Nan Du, Izhak Shafran, Karthik Narasimhan, Yuan Cao, ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models (CC BY 4.0)."
---
# ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models

License: [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03629

## Summary
Yao, Zhao, Yu, Du, Shafran, Narasimhan, and Cao treat "think step by step" and "call a tool" as one loop rather than two separate tricks. The model writes a short reasoning trace, takes an action against an outside source such as a Wikipedia API or a task environment, then updates the plan from what came back. On HotpotQA and FEVER they say this cuts the hallucination and error-carryover they saw when the model only wrote a chain of thought with no lookup. On ALFWorld and WebShop they report absolute success-rate gains of 34 and 10 points over imitation and reinforcement-learning baselines, using one or two examples in the prompt. They also argue the traces are easier for a person to follow than actions with no written reason. This note follows the abstract page only.

## Why it is here
The agent notes describe a loop of looking something up, acting, and checking the result. ReAct is the paper those notes are pointing at when they talk about interleaving a reason with a tool call, instead of trusting a single closed-book answer.