---
title: "Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models"
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171
source_license: "CC BY 4.0"
attribution: "Summary by iinventedlight (AI-assisted). Source: arXiv, \"Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models\" (CC BY 4.0)."
condensed_by: "iinventedlight (Grok Bot, AI-assisted)"
fact_checked: 2026-11-02
date: 2026-11-02
status: reviewed
reviewed_on: 2026-11-02
category: arxiv
arxiv_id: 2203-11171-self-consistency
alias: 2203-11171-self-consistency
checked_on: 2026-11-02
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171
source_license: "CC BY 4.0 (arXiv paper)"
arxiv_license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
arxiv_license_checked: 2026-11-02
arxiv_license_check_note: "License link read from the paper\'s own arXiv abstract page on 2026-11-02."
summary_policy: "Short original summary with attribution; no passages copied, at most brief phrases quoted."
attribution: "Summary by iinventedlight (AI-assisted), condensed and paraphrased; sources: Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Denny Zhou, \"Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models\", arXiv:2203.11171 (CC BY 4.0)"
condensed_by: "iinventedlight (Grok Bot, AI-assisted)"
fact_checked: 2026-11-02
date: 2026-11-02
category: arxiv
tags: arxiv, llm, paper-summary
checked_on: 2026-11-02
sources:
  - id: S1
    title: "Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models"
    authors: "Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Denny Zhou"
    publisher: "arXiv"
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171
    accessed: 2026-11-02
    license: "CC BY 4.0"
    attribution: "Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Denny Zhou, \"Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models\", arXiv:2203.11171 (CC BY 4.0)"
---
# Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models

# Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models

## Summary
Self-consistency replaces greedy decoding in chain-of-thought prompting. It samples several different reasoning paths and keeps the answer that most of them agree on. The idea is that a hard problem can be solved in several ways that all lead to the same correct answer. It added large gains on arithmetic and commonsense benchmarks, for example +17.9% on GSM8K.

*Draft. License: CC BY 4.0 (this summary). Sources: [S1] arXiv, "Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models" (CC BY 4.0).*

## When to apply
- Questions with a single checkable final answer (math, multiple choice).
- When accuracy matters more than cost.

## Paper
- Title: Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models
- Authors: Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Denny Zhou
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171 (first posted 2022-03-21)
- License: CC BY 4.0 (checked on the arXiv abstract page 2026-11-02)
- Read for this note: arXiv abstract page; figures restate the abstract.

## Related
- 2201.11903 Chain-of-Thought Prompting (published)

## Facts
- id: F1
  claim: Self-consistency is a decoding strategy that samples diverse chain-of-thought reasoning paths instead of one greedy path.
  confidence: medium
  date: 2026-11-02
  sources: [S1]
  license: CC BY 4.0
  checked_on: 2026-11-02
- id: F2
  claim: It picks the most consistent final answer across samples (marginalizing over reasoning paths, in practice a majority vote).
  confidence: medium
  date: 2026-11-02
  sources: [S1]
  license: CC BY 4.0
  checked_on: 2026-11-02
- id: F3
  claim: Reported gains over chain-of-thought prompting: GSM8K +17.9%, SVAMP +11.0%, AQuA +12.2%, StrategyQA +6.4%, ARC-challenge +3.9% (author-reported).
  confidence: medium
  date: 2026-11-02
  sources: [S1]
  license: CC BY 4.0
  checked_on: 2026-11-02

## Caveats
- Cost scales with the number of samples.
- Majority voting needs answers that can be compared; it does not apply directly to open-ended writing.

## Pointers
- id: P1
  answers: Full method, experiments and appendices
  where: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11171
  access: free, public web page
