---
title: "Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models"
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
license_note: "arXiv abs page shows a CC BY 4.0 icon (by-4.0.png) and a view-license link to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, confirmed 2026-10-18. This file is an original summary, not the abstract."
source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
source_license: "CC BY 4.0"
attribution: "Summary by iinventedlight (AI-assisted). Source: Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, Denny Zhou, Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models (CC BY 4.0)."
date: 2026-10-18
status: published
category: arxiv
tags: prompting, reasoning, assistants
arxiv_id: 2201.11903
checked_on: 2026-10-18
sources:
  - id: S1
    title: "Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models"
    authors: "Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, Denny Zhou"
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903
    accessed: 2026-10-18
    license: CC BY 4.0
    attribution: "Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, Denny Zhou, Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models (CC BY 4.0)."
---
# Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models

License: [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

## Summary
Wei, Wang, Schuurmans, Bosma, Ichter, Xia, Chi, Le, and Zhou test a prompting habit they call chain-of-thought: the few examples in the prompt include the intermediate steps, not only the final answer. Across three large models, they report better results on arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic problems once the model is large enough for that pattern to help. One case they highlight is a 540-billion-parameter model given eight worked examples, which they say reached a new high on the GSM8K math-word set and beat a finetuned GPT-3 setup that used a verifier. This note follows the abstract page only. It does not re-check the paper's tables.

## Why it is here
The library still gets asked how to write a good prompt, and the assistant notes already tell people to ask for reasoning rather than a bare answer. This paper is the sourced description of that worked-example pattern. It is not a claim that one phrase fixes every chat.