---
title: "Getting the most from AI assistants (Grok, ChatGPT, Claude and similar)"
license: CC-BY-4.0
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
source: https://iinventedlight.com/library/notes/getting-the-most-from-ai-assistants.md
author: "iinventedlight (synthesis of cited sources); text drafted with AI assistance"
date: 2026-10-14
status: reviewed
reviewed_on: 2026-10-14
checked_on: 2026-10-14
sources:
  - id: S1
    title: "How I use LLMs (Andrej Karpathy, 2025)"
    publisher: Andrej Karpathy (YouTube)
    url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: "restricted: restated, not copied"
  - id: S2
    title: "Sam Altman on Building the Future of AI (OpenAI Forum, 2026)"
    publisher: OpenAI (YouTube)
    url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpUKNYcgM-E
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: "restricted: restated, not copied"
  - id: S3
    title: "Andrej Karpathy: Software Is Changing (Again) (2025)"
    publisher: Y Combinator (YouTube)
    url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCEmiRjPEtQ
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: "restricted: restated, not copied"
  - id: S4
    title: "Andrej Karpathy: From Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering (2026)"
    publisher: Sequoia Capital (YouTube)
    url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96jN2OCOfLs
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: "restricted: restated, not copied"
  - id: S5
    title: "How AI Impacts Skill Formation (arXiv 2601.20245, v2)"
    publisher: arXiv (Shen & Tamkin)
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20245
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: "restricted: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, restated, not copied"
  - id: S6
    title: "Recursive Language Models (arXiv 2512.24601, v3)"
    publisher: arXiv (Zhang, Kraska, Khattab)
    url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24601
    accessed: 2026-10-14
    license: CC BY 4.0
---
# Getting the most from AI assistants (Grok, ChatGPT, Claude and similar)

*Note, 2026-10-14. Status: reviewed. Tags: ai, agents, research.*
*Authorship: synthesis by iinventedlight from the cited sources; text drafted with AI assistance (Grok Bot), reviewed by Cole Withington on 2026-10-14.*

## Summary
To get more from an assistant: pick the right mode (thinking, search or deep research, code tools) for the task [F2–F4]. Keep one topic per chat and paste in the material you want used [F1]. Ask for the sources behind factual claims and open them [F5, F6]. Treat confident answers and viral claims about AI with skepticism [F7, F8]. If you are learning, ask for explanations, not just answers [F9].

## Sections
### Pick the right mode
- Use a reasoning ("thinking") model for hard math, code and analysis; a quick model is enough for simple lookups [F2].
- Use web search or deep research for current facts, and a code tool for calculations [F3].
- Casual users who stick to default settings tend to underestimate what current models can do [F4].

### Manage context
- Start a new chat when you change topic, and put the documents you want used directly into the chat [F1].
- Save repeated instructions as custom instructions or a reusable assistant [F10].
- Very long inputs are hard for models. Research methods exist, but a plain chat may miss details in huge pastes [F11].

### Ask for synthesis, not summary (our recommendation)
- **Unsourced practice, not a tested finding:** ask the assistant to compare sources, find where they agree and disagree, and say what follows, rather than condensing one text. Ask it to mark what it inferred versus what a source states. None of our sources test this specific prompt style.

### Name sources and check claims
- Ask for sources by name (paper, page, official video) and open the ones that matter. Models can hallucinate, especially without search [F5, F6].
- Be suspicious and probe. Models can be strong at hard tasks yet fail simple ones ("jagged") [F7].
- Check viral claims about AI against the original. Our own checks found social posts that overstated papers [F8].

### Protect your own understanding
- If the goal is learning, ask for explanations, or generate code and then ask the assistant to explain it. Full delegation went with the lowest learning scores in one study [F9].

### Hype labels
- **Dated:** product and model names in 2025 talks are out of date. The habits still apply; the menus may differ.
- **Speculation:** claims that a single prompting trick "replaces" skills or that you "no longer need prompts" are unsupported. One such caption attributed to Altman does not appear in the talk's transcript.

## Facts
- id: F1
  claim: Karpathy explains that everything in a chat shares one context window, the model's working memory, and advises starting new chats for new topics because long contexts can distract the model and cost more.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-02-27
  sources: [S1]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F2
  claim: Karpathy recommends reasoning ("thinking") models for hard math and code, and says they are not needed for simple lookups.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-02-27
  sources: [S1]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F3
  claim: Karpathy recommends web search for fresh facts, deep research for long sourced reports, and a Python tool for calculations and charts.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-02-27
  sources: [S1]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F4
  claim: Altman describes a "capability overhang". Casual users check in occasionally on default settings, never try reasoning modes, and so underestimate progress.
  confidence: low
  date: 2026-04-07
  sources: [S2]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpUKNYcgM-E
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
  note: Speaker leads an AI company (conflict of interest).
- id: F5
  claim: Karpathy notes that a model's knowledge stops at a training cutoff and that answers without search risk hallucination.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-02-27
  sources: [S1]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F6
  claim: Karpathy describes LLMs as able to hallucinate, having jagged abilities, keeping no lasting memory between sessions, and being vulnerable to prompt injection.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-06-19
  sources: [S3]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCEmiRjPEtQ
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F7
  claim: Karpathy gives the example of a model that refactors large codebases yet gives absurd advice on a simple everyday question, and advises users to stay suspicious and probe the model.
  confidence: low
  date: 2026-04-29
  sources: [S4]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96jN2OCOfLs
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
  note: S3 and S4 are the same speaker; jaggedness is not independently corroborated here.
- id: F8
  claim: A widely shared post said Recursive Language Models "solved AI memory". The paper makes no such claim; it evaluates an inference-time method on four benchmarks and lists open limitations.
  confidence: medium
  date: 2025-12-31
  sources: [S6]
  url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24601
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0
- id: F9
  claim: In a randomized study (n=52), learners using a chat AI scored about 17% lower on a later no-AI quiz. Those who generated code and then asked for explanations scored highest (about 86%), and those who fully delegated scored lowest (below 40%).
  confidence: low
  date: 2026-01-28
  sources: [S5]
  url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20245
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement; source is CC BY-NC-ND, not quoted)
  note: Small, post-hoc clusters; a single one-hour task.
- id: F10
  claim: Karpathy recommends memory, custom instructions and custom assistants so you don't have to repeat the same prompts.
  confidence: low
  date: 2025-02-27
  sources: [S1]
  url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0 (our restatement)
- id: F11
  claim: The Recursive Language Models paper reports that on information-dense tasks, summarizing or compacting long inputs drops needed details. On a pairwise-comparison task, base models scored F1 of 0.1% or less.
  confidence: medium
  date: 2025-12-31
  sources: [S6]
  url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24601
  checked_on: 2026-10-14
  license: CC BY 4.0

## Pointers
- answers: Screen-recorded walkthrough of everyday LLM features (search, deep research, code, voice, images)
  where: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWvNQjAaOHw
  access: free on YouTube (2h11m; Feb 2025, so products are dated)

## Disagreements
- None recorded. Note that most advice here comes from one practitioner (Karpathy). Independent open sources testing these habits are still needed before any fact is rated high.
